Cases 31 - 40 of 86
HARVEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. HARVEY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM SHOUPE, MARK CAPOZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARMS v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv01033
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, FR. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2016cv01019
Plaintiff:
KELLY GIBSON
Defendant:
STEVEN BUZAS, SHAUN IREY, FIRST NAME UNKNOWN PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESABETINO v. BIAGINI et al
as 2:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DESABETINO
Defendant:
SEAN BIAGINI, MICHAEL SNIDER, JOHN SYMSEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON et al
as 3:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON, DEPUTY J. CLOSE, DEPUTY HOLLIBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLEMING JR. v. DEMORE et al
as 2:2015cv01479
Plaintiff:
RONALD FLEMING
Defendant:
DEMORE, SHAFFER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STORY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01241
Plaintiff:
STANTON STORY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, KERRI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VUKICH v. ROITZ et al
as 2:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. VUKICH
Defendant:
TONI ROITZ, STEPHANIE KELLY, MATTEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOOLEY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL SCHOOLEY
Defendant:
J. D. SMITH , BRIGGS and D. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIPLEY v. CAPOZZA et al
as 3:2014cv00202
Petitioner:
JOHN R. SHIPLEY
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA , KELLY CALLIHAN and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
