Cases 41 - 50 of 253
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLEW v. DOE
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
TED BALLEW
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNO v. OBERLANDER
as 1:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TIERNO
Defendant:
DEREK OBERLANDER, E. MANGELUZZO, M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLEW v. DOE
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
TED BALLEW
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KNEBEL v. COUNTY OF BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. KNEBEL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, PRISON BOARD OF BUTLER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHLAGER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARIO MEDINA
Defendant:
OFFICER JONES, SERGEANT WINGER, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
MAINS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
SHANE MICHAEL MAINS
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JANE/JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al.
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIUTENANT JANE DOE, SEGREGATION OFFICER SALYARD, MEDICAL PROVIDER GAUDET, D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
