Cases 41 - 50 of 94
RODRIGUEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2019cv00119
Respondent:
DIRECTOR MATHEW ALBENCE, DIRECTOR HUGH J. HURWITZ, SECRETARY KEVIN MCALEENAN and others
Petitioner:
LEONARDO LLERAS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00149
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
JUSTIN RAPHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIMCHAK v. SCI LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 3:2019cv00084
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY ELLIOT SULCOVE and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00084
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT LONNIE OLIVER and DOC SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
KIM VO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, DORINA VARNER, GOVENOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TREADWAY v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER ALLEN TREADWAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VICTOR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant:
COUNSELOR HOPKINS, LT. WALKER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TAYLOR v. CHESMER et al
as 2:2018cv01579
Defendant:
SUPER. ROBERT GILMORE, SGT. CHESMER, LT. TROUT and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Dr. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, JAY COWAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
