Cases 51 - 60 of 60
TAYLOR v. BARONE et al
as 1:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, EDWARD J. WOJCIK, KURT L. GRANLUND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. VISINSKY et al
as 3:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, DENISE R. THOMAS, JACK DEPNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. USA
as 2:2010cv00044
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KENNETH TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
NEWSUAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
TAYLOR, RENEE ZOBITROE, HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN SCOTT v. CHERISH et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
KARL VAN SCOTT
Defendant:
JOSH CHERISH, SHELLY TAYLOR, ROXANN CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. USA
as 2:2009cv00352
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv01702
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TAYLOR v. GONZALEZ et al
as 3:2008cv00213
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOHN YOST, JOHN YOST, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. COLEMEN et al
as 2:2008cv01068
Petitioner:
JEFFERY TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 3:2007cv00137
Plaintiff:
TREVOR MATTIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE PATRICK, CO TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
