Cases 61 - 70 of 74
ROSADO v. DOE et al
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
JERONIMO ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JON DOE, ROGER S. VIRGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. USA
as 1:2009cv00102
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
YAKEEN ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HAWKINS v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE HAWKINS
Defendant:
MARILYN BROOKS, RHODA WINSTEAD, ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JEFFREY A. BEARD, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPADY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01599
Plaintiff:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LAURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN D. SCHAFFER, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv00736
Petitioner:
ROGER WILSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ROGERS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
ANTWON ROGERS, ANDRE CAMPBELL and DESMOND SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL B. MUKASEL and BRIAN GRIMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KARNES v. PATRICK et al
as 2:2008cv00495
Petitioner:
ROGER JOEL KARNES
Respondent:
GEORGE PATRICK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROGERS v. J. et al
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROGERS
Defendant:
R. J., SMITT, TERRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHES v. DYKSTRA et al
as 2:2007cv01740
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
LENNY DYKSTRA, GARY SHEFFIELD, DAVID JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
