Cases 71 - 80 of 11,815
BROWN v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, SOE VENELLI, CMC ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Defendant:
M. J. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, MR. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
STANKO v. USA
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GEORGE STANKO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MAJOR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED-GRAVES v. USA
as 2:2024cv00640
Petitioner:
DOMINIQUE REED-GRAVES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JACKSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
STEVEN JACKSON
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and INTERIM WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
