Cases 81 - 90 of 93
ROBINSON v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
ERIC ROBINSON
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, CHRISTINE KENNEDY, J. REED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LASKARIS v. FOULK et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Petitioner:
ANDREW PETER LASKARIS
Respondent:
BRADLEY FOULK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and D. S. CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HUGHES v. LONGSTREET et al
as 1:2008cv00353
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUGHES
Defendant:
PETER LONGSTREET, MAXINE OVERTON, SU and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPENCER v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JEFFREY A. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01166
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JEFFREY A. BEARD, CORRECTIONS HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATOR ROBERT TRETINIK, PSYCHIATRIST PETER SAAVEDRA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMOTHERS v. VALKO, et al
as 3:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
PETER L. SMOTHERS
Defendant:
BILL VALKO and VINCENT ARCARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. LONGSTREET et al
as 1:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUGHES
Defendant:
PETER LONGSTREET, M.D., MAXINE OVERTON, NANCY GIROUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FEDIMORE v. LONGSTREET et al
as 1:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FEDIMORE
Defendant:
PETER LONGSTREET and NANCY A. GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINSON v. LONGSTREET et al
as 1:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SWINSON
Defendant:
PETER LONGSTREET, MARYBETH ANDERSON, SCHAEF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Defendant:
MARILYN S. BROOKS, PETER LONGSTREET, CURRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARIN v. PETERS et al
as 2:2007cv00930
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant:
PETERS and LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
