Cases 1 - 10 of 38
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUGAN v. PA D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE DUGAN
Defendant:
PA D.O.C., GEORGE LITTLE, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YEAGER v. SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Petitioner:
SUSAN ELAINE YEAGER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, D.A ROSS MCKEIRNAN, BERNARD T. HESSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSS v. WARDEN TRATE
as 1:2020cv00211
Respondent:
WARDEN TRATE
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN R. ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSS v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2020cv01091
Petitioner:
SHAWNDEN ROSS
Respondent:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON and JOHN R. WALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
