Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
BRAD KING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FAYEMI v. WALTERS et al
as 2:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL O. FAYEMI
Defendant:
RODNEY WALTERS, JOHN R. WALTON, BRAD TOMASELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
DORIAN DAVENPORT
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, BRAD VASY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 2:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Ryan Davis #22692-040
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 1:2022cv00156
Petitioner:
RYAN DAVIS
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
MS WARDEN BRYAN L. KLINE, LIEUTENANT BRAD TOMASELLO, COUNSELOR CORY SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NELSON v. LOWTHER et al
as 2:2021cv00114
Defendant:
PAUL DEPALM, GEORGE LOWTHER, BENJAMIN C. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WHITE v. TRATE
as 1:2020cv00209
Petitioner:
KENNETH A. WHITE
Defendant:
BRAD TRATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
