Cases 1 - 10 of 196
MOFFITT v. WARDEN USP-1 COLEMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00685
Petitioner:
SEAN MOFFITT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Respondent:
WARDEN USP-1 COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLEMAN v. HEIDER et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR COLEMAN
Defendant:
SERGEANT HEIDER, CAPTAIN SKINNER, CAPTAIN SISSEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SABIR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ SABIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, WARDEN VICKIE MOSER, LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. LEE et al
as 1:2019cv00041
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
J. SWATTLER, SGT. MATTHEW MRADINTZ, DAVID PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COLEMAN v. HODGES
as 2:2018cv01152
Defendant:
C/O HODGES
Plaintiff:
BLAINE E. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PAGE-JONES v. WETSEL et al
as 2:2018cv00934
Defendant:
JOHN WETSEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SIMMONS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Defendant:
C/O ELLENBERGER, C/O KUNDICK, FACILITY MANAGER OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COLEMAN v. LUTHER et al
as 3:2018cv00104
Petitioner:
KENNETH M. COLEMAN
Respondent:
JAMEY P. LUTHER
Defendant:
JOSH A. SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCGLINCHEY v. S.C.I. FAYETTE et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MCGLINCHEY
Defendant:
S.C.I. FAYETTE, JOHN UNKNOWN, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JOHN W. SAWTELLE, DEREK F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
