Cases 1 - 10 of 16
TAYLOR v. PIPIK et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSHUA PIPIK, DAVID FLAHTERNY, EBONY MARCELLE-RUDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. USA et al
as 2:2019cv01129
Defendant:
AGENT BLACK OH, CHEIF POLICE OF BRADDOCK, BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BANKS et al v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and RAFAEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MARK R. HORNAK, ERIC ROSEN, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BROWN v. LANCASTER et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LANCASTER et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PUGH et al
as 2:2013cv00119
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
M. PUGH, CCA (CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA), NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
