Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GRAHAM v. MOSCHETTA et al
as 2:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE GRAHAM
Defendant:
A.U.S.A. JEROME MOSCHETTA, DOROTHY CURRY and OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
JOHN SCOTT CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00017
Petitioner:
CURRY ROBINSON
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
CURRY ROBINSON
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMROM, JOHN E. WETZEL, VINCENT DEFELICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. CO. LANGLEY et al
as 3:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
KENDALL CURRY
Defendant:
CO LANGLEY, PA MILLER, PA KAUFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. INDIANA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2014cv01479
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CURRY
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY JAIL and ISIAH PAILLET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. USA
as 2:2012cv00375
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
ERIC ROBINSON
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, CHRISTINE KENNEDY, J. REED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, DAN DAVID, T. D. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. COSLETT et al
as 1:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
JOEL CURRY
Defendant:
JEFFREY COSLETT, PAUL J. ROBERTS, JR., THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
