Cases 1 - 10 of 635
JEAN DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Defendant:
L. J. ODDO, V. CAHILLI and CHIEF OF SECURITY R. BOLLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCINNI, NICOLE SOLANE KONDRLIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOTLE v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
BRIAN TOOTLE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MILLER, PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCLAURIN v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
DORRELL ANTWUN MCLAURIN
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT., JOHN DOE, DET. PILARSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, D. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TROUPE v. SUNDAY et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN TROUPE
Defendant:
SGT SUNDAY, SUPERINTENDENT ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
