Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HARRELL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY B. HARRELL
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN and RESTRICTED HOUSING UNIT OFFICERS AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES AT SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAZA v. WATTERS et al
as 3:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
SANTOS DEAZA
Respondent:
HARREL WATTERS , J. L. NORWOOD , WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUNOZ v. WARDEN C. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PANIAGUA MUNOZ
Respondent:
WARDEN C. MAIORANA, N. WEIDLICH, J. TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRELL v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2012cv00091
Petitioner:
ANTHONY B. HARRELL
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, CAPT. SIMESKO, SYLVIA GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POWERS v. WARDEN WERLINGER et al
as 3:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
ROBERT POWERS
Defendant:
WARDEN WERLINGER, CAPTAIN PHILLIPS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. MR. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
JERRY GERALD GARCIA
Defendant:
MR. ENGLISH, MR. WERLINGER, MR. BRANDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNELL v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2010cv00213
Petitioner:
DENNIS CONNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOOKER v. WARDEN J. YOST et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HOOKER
Defendant:
WARDEN J. YOST, N.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR J.L. NORWOOD, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. MARSH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. CANNON et al
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN PARSONS
Defendant:
KENT W. CANNON, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
