Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BENNETT v. BLOCKER et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BENNETT
Defendant:
SGT. BLOCKER, MS. MILLS and SUPT. HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01368
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA A. MILLS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BREWER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01203
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, -. OWENS, B. J. SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLES v. VICTORY et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON WARDON and OFFICER VICTORY
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL MILLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DENNIS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, SERGEANT NYMAN, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00136
Petitioner:
LORENZO L. MILLS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, PA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. KORMANIC et al
as 2:2009cv00691
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KORMANIC, PAUL K. SMEAL, LISA G. HOLLZBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VERBANIK v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. VERBANIK
Defendant:
MICHEL HARLOW, FRED RUFFO, MICHEL SCHULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. QUINTANA
as 1:2008cv00339
Petitioner:
TIMMY MILLS
Respondent:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
