Cases 1 - 10 of 24
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
FITZGERALD v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
DAVID WONTAE FITZGERALD
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, JENNIFER SCHAEFFER, NATHAN SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODSON v. SHEESLEY et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, I. GUSTAFSON and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN VETZEL, ERNIE MANGELUZZO, DR. WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EASLEY v. OPERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TABE BICKELL, DR. WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. REUBERG et al
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
REUBERG, ADAMS, SAWTELLI and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DAN HANCOCK, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDEN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00237
Defendant:
SGT. KOPCHICK, CAPTAIN CARTER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
SHAVEZ HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMPSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2018cv00998
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
PAROLE AGENT TAWNYA PEEK, NATE SIMON, PATRICIA VALAURI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
