Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CARMICHAEL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR ADULT OFFENDER SUPERVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RODGERS v. MEEKS et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Respondent:
BOBBIE MEEKS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
MARCUS RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JARAMILLO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS JARAMILLO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION, U.S.DIRECTOR DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JARAMILLO v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2015cv00203
Petitioner:
EDUARDO JARAMILLO
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and C. G. WIGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MAISANO v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01726
Plaintiff:
DALE MAISANO
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, U.S. ATTY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, AZ. ST. ATTORNEY GEN TOM HORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. LONGLEY et al
as 1:2011cv00128
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVIS
Respondent:
ARCHIE LONGLEY and UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABBOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC JOSEPH ABBOTT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOLANA v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2007cv00084
Petitioner:
GERARDO SOLANA
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, M. MILLWARD and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
