Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00604
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAVILA-CABRERA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
HORACIO DEAVILA-CABRERA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2012cv00019
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY L. SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABBOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC JOSEPH ABBOTT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
