Cases 21 - 30 of 33
BAEZ v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE V. MILLWARD, ET AL.
as 3:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
COLIN ROSE
Defendant:
M. MILLWARD, MS. DAWSON, MD., FAMIGLIO, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGO v. THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON et al
as 3:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
AMAYA HUGO
Defendant:
THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON, MR. P. HARVEY, MD, MRS. R. MEECE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LIM
as 2:2008cv01137
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAWSON LIM
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
URLING v. MILLWARD et al
as 3:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
IAN LANCELOT URLING
Defendant:
MIKE MILLWARD, MCDEVITT, OFFICER SCOTT SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGO v. MR. ZENK et al
as 3:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
AMAYA HUGO
Defendant:
MR. ZENK, MS. DAWSON, DR. CUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
URLING v. MILLWARD et al
as 3:2008cv00086
Plaintiff:
IAN LANCELOT URLING
Defendant:
MIKE MILLWARD, MCDEVITT, OFFICER SCOTT SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IBARRA v. ZENK et al
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
MANUEL IBARRA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZENK, MS. DAWSON, DR. ROMEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLO v. DOCTOR ROMEO et al
as 3:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
JOEL BELLO
Defendant:
DOCTOR ROMEO, MS. DAWSON, MR. ZENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GUILLEN v. MR. ZENK et al
as 3:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
JULIAN GUILLEN
Defendant:
MR. ZENK, M. DAWSON, DOCTOR FAMIGLIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
