Cases 21 - 30 of 33
DINAPLES v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al
as 2:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
DONNA DINAPLES
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KRILL v. TOTAL CARD, INC et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. KRILL
Defendant:
TOTAL CARD, INC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SULLIVAN v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., LVNV FUNDING, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
POPE v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
KAREN POPE
Defendant:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC , CAVALRY SPV I, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DINAPLES v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
DONNA DINAPLES
Defendant:
FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GILMORE v. CHASE RECEIVABLES et al
as 2:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA GILMORE
Defendant:
CHASE RECEIVABLES and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VEHEC et al v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. VEHEC and GIGI C. VEHEC
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PANICHELLA v. LAW OFFICES OF HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H. PANICHELLA
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BELL v. SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEMS, L.P. et al
as 2:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
SEAN BELL
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEMS, L.P. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HEATH v. DOGUN et al
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant:
EYETA JOHN DOGUN, NANCY A. GIROUX, ULLIE KLEMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
