Cases 21 - 30 of 35
DAVIS et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 3:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. DAVIS and FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD
Defendant:
CHARLES S. SAMUELS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMINISTRATOR, G. C. WIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JEAN-JACQUES v. THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
SNIDERS JEAN-JACQUES
Defendant:
THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and GEO GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KALU v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00265
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., GEORGE WIGEN, JACK ZIMMERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. DRIVE et al
as 3:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
JESUS IZQUIERDO GARCIA
Defendant:
GEORGE C. DRIVE, DR. ZIMMERLY and GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTE v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2015cv00056
Petitioner:
EMILIO MARTE
Respondent:
GEORGE WIGEN, GEO GROUPS, INC. and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
SAUL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., JOSEPH TAVARES, GC WIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
RONALD GREENLAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. BENSON, CAMERON LINDSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LONGORIA-LACHAPELLE v. MR. CAMERON LINDSAY et al
as 3:2011cv00224
Petitioner:
VINICIO JAVIER LONGORIA-LACHAPELLE
Respondent:
MR. CAMERON LINDSAY, GEO GROUP INC. and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
