Cases 21 - 29 of 29
MICHAELS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01181
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY RENEE MICHAELS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
THE AYCO COMPANY, L.P. v. LIPTON et al
as 2:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
THE AYCO COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. LIPTON and SHELLEY L. LIPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WILLIAMS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY R. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HILTON et al
as 2:2010cv01602
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUSSELL D. HILTON and SHELLEY A. HILTON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. JOHNSTOWN CITY VIEW, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , GIBB BROTHERS MUSIC , CROMPTON SONGS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN CITY VIEW, INC. and ANDREW C. LASKY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SHELLEY v. MULLEN et al
as 3:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
BARRY E. SHELLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY L. MULLEN, SCOTT W. WALKER, EDWARD BAKALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELLEY v. PATRICK et al
as 3:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
BARRY E. SHELLEY
Defendant:
GEORGE PATRICK, RANDALL E. BRITTON, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT RANDALL E. BRITTON et al
as 3:2009cv00080
Petitioner:
BARRY E. SHELLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDALL E. BRITTON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GNC FRANCHISING LLC et al v. DUBOIS NUTRITION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00680
Plaintiff:
GNC FRANCHISING LLC, GNC FRANCHISING LLC, GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
DUBOIS NUTRITION, INC., CHRISTOPHER DUBOIS and SHELLEY DUBOIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
