Cases 21 - 30 of 221
TAYLOR v. FIERST ONE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
DAWN TAYLOR
Defendant:
FIERST ONE, LLC doing business as FOX'S PIZZA DEN ZELIENOPLE and BILL FIERST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
TAYLOR v. HONORABLE DAVID ACKER et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
HONORABLE DAVID ACKER and ALEXANDER ROY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEBADLO v. CLUBHOUSE CARDS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GEBADLO
Defendant:
CLUBHOUSE CARDS, LLC and DINO TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DETSCHELT v. NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DETSCHELT
Defendant:
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT and JEFFREY M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
