Cases 21 - 30 of 31
MURRELL et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv00896
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MURRELL and CHRISTINE MURRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NORTH DISTRICTS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
NORTH DISTRICTS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIRST CHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
FIRST CHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANIER v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LANIER
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2021 Right to re-employment of inducted persons
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv01629
Plaintiff:
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HIGGINS v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. et al
as 2:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
VICKI L. HIGGINS
Defendant:
TARGET NATIONAL BANK, N.A. , ADAM GRIM , JANICE L. LOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
C.S., et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
C.S. , T. ERIC SURMAN and LAURA SURMAN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and GLORIA SURMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURMAN et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00784
Plaintiff:
CAMRYN SURMAN , T. ERIC SURMAN and LAURA SURMAN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and GLORIA SURMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURMAN et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
CAMRYN SURMAN , T. ERIC SURMAN and LAURA SURMAN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CALLOWAY et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CALLOWAY and SHAWN CALLOWAY
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
