Cases 21 - 28 of 28
KHATRI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 2:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
SARITA KHATRI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
GREWAL v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 2:2008cv01439
Plaintiff:
GAYATRI GREWAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MARKS v. NOVAK et al
as 2:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
ADAM A. MARKS
Defendant:
PAUL NOVAK and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UKANI v. KEISLER et al
as 2:2007cv01394
Plaintiff:
RANJANBEN PARSHOTTAMBHAI UKANI
Defendant:
PETER D. KEISLER, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
MADAR v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATIONS SERVICES
as 2:2007cv01254
Plaintiff:
JOSEF RICHARD MADAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATIONS SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
DOLGOSHEEV v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 2:2007cv01019
Plaintiff:
MAXIM DOLGOSHEEV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GUNDUZ v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00780
Plaintiff:
KADIR GUNDUZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HOOSHYAR v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00647
Plaintiff:
DARYOUSH HOOSHYAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
