Cases 31 - 40 of 44
JOHNSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv00039
Petitioner:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LESKO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv01049
Petitioner:
JOHN C. LESKO
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRISPELL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
DANIEL CRISPELL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFF MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAULK v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv00918
Petitioner:
LEWIS FAULK
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv00862
Petitioner:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENNEDY v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv00542
Petitioner:
DAVID ROBERT KENNEDY
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUMHAMMERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv00258
Petitioner:
RICHARD BAUMHAMMERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REED v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv00110
Petitioner:
DENNIS C. REED
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OHLER v. LAMAS et al
as 3:2011cv00011
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEVIN OHLER
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, TOM CORBETT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2010cv00293
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS MILLER
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
