Cases 31 - 40 of 69
RICHARDSON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 3:2014cv00015
Petitioner:
LAVELLE RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. PRES. B. OBAMA et al
as 3:2013cv00279
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
PRES. B. OBAMA, E. HOLDER and M. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01716
Petitioner:
COURTNEY RICHARDSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01466
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 2:2013cv00937
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
AARON RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 2:2013cv00923
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
AARON RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00923
Petitioner:
AARON RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS, APODACA, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
