Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
QUANTUM PLATING, INC. v. CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
QUANTUM PLATING, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC. and BLUE SPRING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HEIDE v. SEVEN SPRINGS FARM, INC.
as 3:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER R. HEIDE
Defendant:
SEVEN SPRINGS FARM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AND NUMBERED AS 305 DOUBLETREE DRIVE, VENETIA, PA 15367 et al
as 2:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AND NUMBERED AS 305 DOUBLETREE DRIVE, VENETIA, PA 15367 and ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF MATTHEW MCCONAGHY IN THE HUNTLEY 2006 SPRING PROGRAM OF HUNTLEY & HUNTLEY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
ZUCKER, et al v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECT., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:1991cv00354
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ZUCKER , STANLEY HERSHFANG and JACOB JOSEPH MILLER
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION , J. C. MAROUS and P. E. LEGO
Consol_plaintiff:
TOBY FEUER , SPRING CREEK CARDIO-MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST , GLORIA BERTINATO and others
Consol_defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED , WESTINGHOUSE CREDIT CORPORATION , WILLIAM A. POWE and others
Movant:
WAYNE S. HARDENBROOK , STILES WEST ASSOCIATES, LTD. and TERRY W. STILES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.