Cases 41 - 50 of 317
WELTY v. KMETZ et al
as 2:2021cv01854
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
C/O 1 KMETZ and C/O 1 HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 J.E. LEWIS, C/O 1 PAVLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARRETT et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BARRETT and JOSEPH SIMON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. c/o CT CORPORATION SYSTEM ALLEGHENY doing business as WAL-MART SUPERCENTER and WALMART STORES EAST, INC. c/o CT CORPORATION SYSTEM ALLEGHENY doing business as WALMART SUPERCENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01373
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 MCGINNIS, C/O 1 POLYBLANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. LT. NAPOLEAN et al
as 2:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
LT. NAPOLEAN, SGT. ZHAURUNG, C/O KARPENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. NAPOLEAN et al
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
LT NAPOLEAN, SGT ZHAURUNG, C/O EDDIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00836
Defendant:
MS. SHREVE, C/O 4 ELZMUND, JOSHUA LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
