Cases 51 - 60 of 139
ASSAD v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ASSAD
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION , J. RICH ALEXANDER , RANDALL S. DEARTH and others
Mediator:
ARTHUR H. STROYD
Plaintiff_consolidated:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BANKS v. SONG
as 2:2017mc00674
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARSHALL v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
RENEE L. MARSHALL
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FRANCES E. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00226
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA et al v. MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2016mc00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and NOON BEAR
Defendant:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
DOBSON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
KASEEN DOBSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01211
Petitioner:
DANIEL KEITH MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRE-TRIAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
