Cases 71 - 80 of 157
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SABIR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ SABIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, WARDEN VICKIE MOSER, LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EL v. MATSON et al
as 2:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
RYSHEIRD MALIK EL, RYSHEID MALIK EX REL BALDWIN and RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MATSON, JEFFEY GRANTZ, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SHEARS v. SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
DAARON SHEARS
Defendant:
SCI FOREST, LIEUTENANT HAGGERTY, COL. CALTAGARONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
ELI DAVIS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDEN SAWTELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUXTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS, KAREN FEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEMMONS v. DOE et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
VICTOR K. LEMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE and LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
