Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MUNOZ v. WARDEN C. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PANIAGUA MUNOZ
Respondent:
WARDEN C. MAIORANA, N. WEIDLICH, J. TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POWERS v. WARDEN WERLINGER et al
as 3:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
ROBERT POWERS
Defendant:
WARDEN WERLINGER, CAPTAIN PHILLIPS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. MR. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
JERRY GERALD GARCIA
Defendant:
MR. ENGLISH, MR. WERLINGER, MR. BRANDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNELL v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2010cv00213
Petitioner:
DENNIS CONNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOOKER v. WARDEN J. YOST et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HOOKER
Defendant:
WARDEN J. YOST, N.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR J.L. NORWOOD, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. MARSH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. CANNON et al
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN PARSONS
Defendant:
KENT W. CANNON, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. ZENK et al
as 3:2009cv00025
Petitioner:
FAVELL J. THOMAS
Respondent:
MIKE ZENK, J. SHAW, JAMES E. BURRELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WEBSTER v. TRIMBATH et al
as 3:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WEBSTER
Defendant:
JEFFREY G. TRIMBATH, DANIEL J. LEONARD, JOHN YOST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
