Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
GANWEI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NIAZI v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01643
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD NIAZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01435
Plaintiff:
SOODEH EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01429
Plaintiff:
SAMAN EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01431
Plaintiff:
SAREH EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
BUDAK v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01401
Plaintiff:
BARIS BUDAK
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
UKANI v. KEISLER et al
as 2:2007cv01394
Plaintiff:
RANJANBEN PARSHOTTAMBHAI UKANI
Defendant:
PETER D. KEISLER, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
