Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Carter-Kish v. Bullhead Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Meisha Carter-Kish
Defendant:
Bullhead Investments, LLC, Richard L Jackson and Darren Woods
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rieder et al v. Crum et al
as 2:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Rieder and Mary C Rieder
Defendant:
David Crum, Brian Horton and Edward Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Warren County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Wanda Gail Campbell
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff's Department , Warren County, Tennessee , Jackie Matheny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morelock v. SRA Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Almond D Morelock
Defendant:
SRA Associates, Inc. , LeAnn Semerna , Alayna Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. GC Services (TV1)
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ralph D Carter
Defendant:
GC Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. Vion Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00027
Defendant:
Vion Holdings, LLC , Anitra Carter and Grisham, Knight & Hooper
Plaintiff:
James Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Greene v. Vion Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00028
Defendant:
Vion Holdings, LLC , Anitra Carter and Grisham, Knight & Hooper
Plaintiff:
Endle Greene
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burton v. Durnin et al (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Benjamin S Burton
Defendant:
Joe Durnin, Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency, Andy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cash 4 Gold Inc
as 2:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Walter G Carter
Defendant:
Cash 4 Gold Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Airport Honda Motor Sales et al
as 3:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Walter G Carter
Defendant:
Airport Honda Motor Sales, Chris Denny, Kevin Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
