Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Goodwin v. City of Bristol, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Eric Keller, Scott Shaffer, John Kistner and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffey v. Riojas et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Defendant:
Julian Riojas and Bristol City of TN
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomsen
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, City of Bristol, Tennessee, James Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swann v. Bristol, TN Prosecution (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
James J Swann and James Swann, Jr
Defendant:
Bristol, TN Prosecution, Michael Nygaard, Bruce Ballis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig et al v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al (PLR2)
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bradley Craig , Gary Craig and Jerry Craig
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, City of Bristol, Tennessee , Washington County, Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhymer et al v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Allen W Rhymer, Jr and Lindsey A Rhymer
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of , Blaine Wade , Albert M Overbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Still et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Melissa D Ward
Defendant:
Michael A Still, - Camper, - Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
James R Love
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of, Blaine E Wade and Justin Branson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Love v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
James R Love and James R Love
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of, Blaine E Wade and - Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
