Cases 121 - 130 of 5,392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe #048 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John Doe #048
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ward v. Shelbyville Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Casey L Ward
Defendant:
Shelbyville Police Department and Michael W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Skinner et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edd Bennett
Defendant:
Kalieb Skinner and Monroe County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sturgill v. The City of Kingsport, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Sturgill
Defendant:
City of Kingsport TN, Robert Mills, Emily Rhoton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCormick v. Brock et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
James E McCormick
Defendant:
Michael Brock, Cassie Sullivan, Isaac Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #014 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
John Doe #014
Defendant:
Governor William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Potter v. TN Department of Safety and Homeland Security
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christina Potter
Defendant:
TN Department of Safety and Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
