Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Presley v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alton Lee Presley
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Stephen M Graves, Pam Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bean et al v. Teague et al
as 3:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Robert Bean , Jacquleen Axley , Carl S Bivins and others
Defendant:
Steve Teague and Monroe County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Ralph K Freeman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and William Henry Walker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Cary L. Wilkerson and Cary L. Wilkerson
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, Ron Littlefield, Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodine v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2009cv00050
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Freeman Cooper, Bobby Dodd and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F Goodine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
William Henry Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Kenneth Freeman and Edwin McPherson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Anderson County Board of Education et al
as 3:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
Malissa Denise Evans and Malissa Denise Evans
Defendant:
Anderson County Board of Education, Gary Houck, Clemmer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael - Smith
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Z Moody, Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
