Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drew Miller
Defendant:
County of Hamilton, Tennessee, Sheriff Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tepe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
United States, Curtis L Collier, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ledford v. City of Red Bank, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
William Rex Ledford
Defendant:
City of Red Bank, Tennessee, Leigh Taylor Noorbergen and Daniel White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mitchell v. Sullivan Co Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Travis J Mitchell
Defendant:
Sullivan Co Sheriffs Office, Board of Probation and Parole, Charles Cochney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. CHAT-TN, LLC
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Tawanna Taylor
Defendant:
CHAT-TN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Taylor v. McIntosh
as 3:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Taylor
Defendant:
Officer McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
