Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Byers et al v. Hargis et al
as 4:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dennis Byers , Clarence T. Birdwell , Leslie Brent King and others
Defendant:
Hubert Hargis , Grundy County, Tennessee Highway Department and Grundy County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Union County Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jason C Smith and Jana K Smith
Defendant:
Union County Tennessee, Union County Sheriff's Department, City of Maynardville, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00459
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene King
Defendant:
Anderson County, Tennessee and Ryan T Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. McCarter et al
as 1:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Rickie L King
Defendant:
Keith McCarter , City of Niota, Tennessee and Niota Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Tennessee et al v. Waters et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William England, Peggy Marshall and others
Defendant:
Larry Waters , Phil King , Gary Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramirez-Rosales v. Matheny
as 4:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Celsa Ramirez-Rosales, Omar Abad-Ramirez, Elias Abad-Ramirez and others
Defendant:
Jackie Matheny, Tommy - Myers, Edward D. Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
