Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Alexander v. Claiborne County, TN et al (PLR1)
as 3:2016cv00203
Plaintiff: James Brian Alexander
Defendant: Claiborne County, TN, David Ray, Christain A Southern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
R.R. v. Hopper et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00529
Plaintiff: R. R. and Dania Soto
Defendant: Adam Hopper, Sevier County Sheriff's Department and Sevier County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00160
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder et al v. McMinn County, Tennessee
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff: Lacey M. Crowder and Adam Moses
Defendant: McMinn County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vincent v. Morgan County, Tennessee et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00058
Plaintiff: Brigitte Vincent
Defendant: Morgan County, Tennessee and Andrea Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bunch v. City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee et al (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff: Adam T Bunch
Defendant: City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, James T Akagi, Matthew R Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dannenfelser v. Eubanks et al
as 4:2014cv00044
Plaintiff: George J. Dannenfelser, III
Defendant: Adam Eubanks , Troy Durm , Billy Durm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmer et al v. Chattanooga Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00371
Plaintiff: Sean Emmer , Adam Cooley and Tennessee State Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police
Defendant: Chattanooga Police Department , Bobby Dodd and City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?