Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Carter v. Burgess et al
as 1:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ryan Carter
Defendant:
Ronald Burgess, Karen Kroyman and Karen Krogman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minton v. Carter County et al
as 2:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Scotty Minton
Defendant:
Carter County, TN, Carter County Beer Board, Jerry Pearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinen et al v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Richard Hinen , AGH , RJH and others
Defendant:
Hawkins County, Tennessee, Ronnie Lawson, William Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Roane County et al
as 3:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Shasta Lashay Gilmore
Defendant:
Mitch Gritsby , Richard Stooksbury , David Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter-Kish v. Bullhead Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Meisha Carter-Kish
Defendant:
Bullhead Investments, LLC, Richard L Jackson and Darren Woods
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rieder et al v. Crum et al
as 2:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Rieder and Mary C Rieder
Defendant:
David Crum, Brian Horton and Edward Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Warren County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Wanda Gail Campbell
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff's Department , Warren County, Tennessee , Jackie Matheny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morelock v. SRA Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Almond D Morelock
Defendant:
SRA Associates, Inc. , LeAnn Semerna , Alayna Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. GC Services (TV1)
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ralph D Carter
Defendant:
GC Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Greene v. Vion Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00028
Defendant:
Vion Holdings, LLC , Anitra Carter and Grisham, Knight & Hooper
Plaintiff:
Endle Greene
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
