Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Young v. Vion Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00027
Defendant:
Vion Holdings, LLC , Anitra Carter and Grisham, Knight & Hooper
Plaintiff:
James Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burton v. Durnin et al (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Benjamin S Burton
Defendant:
Joe Durnin, Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency, Andy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Cash 4 Gold Inc
as 2:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Walter G Carter
Defendant:
Cash 4 Gold Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Airport Honda Motor Sales et al
as 3:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Walter G Carter
Defendant:
Airport Honda Motor Sales, Chris Denny, Kevin Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. City of Knoxville, TN et al.
as 3:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jamal Carter
Defendant:
Geoffrey K Murret, Geoffrey K Murret and City of Knoxville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reams v. Carter County Board of Education et al
as 2:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Reams, Mary Frances Reams and Mary Frances Reams
Defendant:
Carter County Board of Education and Jonathan Mark McClain
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reams v. Carter County Board of Education et al
as 3:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Reams, Mary Frances Reams and Mary Frances Reams
Defendant:
Carter County Board of Education and Jonathan Mark McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brummitt v. Carter County, TN et al
as 2:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tina M Brummitt
Defendant:
Carter County, TN, Christopher W Mathes, Tina D Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
