Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sayne v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Sayne
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America Bureau of Prisons and Salvation Army, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenboro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00102
Petitioner:
Herman Rosenboro
Respondent:
United States of America and Marty Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Waters v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv00046
Petitioner:
Hinton M Waters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lamont Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, Tracy L Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Blount County Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00395
Petitioner:
Ralph T. O'Neal, III
Respondent:
Blount County Detention Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osborne v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Latawyne Dewright Osborne
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Strickland v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00319
Petitioner:
Edward William Strickland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
A African American U. S. Citizen v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
A African American U. S. Citizen
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
