Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Guess v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Justin Guess
Defendant:
Tim L Pierce, Penny J Pierce, Corey Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
James T Pierce
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Kevin Hampton and Todd Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. USA
as 2:2016cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Aaron Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Marcus Ball, Lt Lowe, Anthony Tester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 3:2014cv00455
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Marcus Ball, Lt Lowe, Anthony Tester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Hawkins County, TN et al
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donald E Pierce, James W Grooms, Jr, Issac Taylor Dean and others
Defendant:
Hawkins County, TN, Hawkins County Sheriff Office and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Sealey et al
as 3:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
E Sealey and Parnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasan v. Psychological Consulting Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul Hasan, Perry Allan and Scott Pierce
Defendant:
Psychological Consulting Services, Inc., Arthur W Stair, III and Nate Jolly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v. Monroe County, TN et al
as 3:2007cv00408
Plaintiff:
Perley Winkler
Defendant:
Monroe County, TN, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Robby Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
