Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryson v. Knox County TN et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Bryson
Defendant:
Knox County TN, Robert Cooter, LT B Keck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Cathey et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Emilio Ortiz
Defendant:
R Cathey and B Brockwel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Criss et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Criss, B Oham and Knox County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Javonte Davis
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Morgan County Correctional Complex, Stacey Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00269
Petitioner:
Michael B. Henry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ketron v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Ketron
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Christy Frazier and Jeff Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wlodarz v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00088
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Wlodarz
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snoddy v. USA
as 4:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Craig B Snoddy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ritchie v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00284
Plaintiff:
Estate of Brandy Ellis b/n/k Paula Ritchie, mother of Brandy Ellis and Paula Ritchie
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Wellpath, LLC, Leslie Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
