Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Dean et al
as 3:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Judge Andrew Mark Freiberg, Monica Datz, James David Cross and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dean Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vick v. Hamilton County District Attorney et al
as 1:2019cv00237
Defendant:
Hamilton County District Attorney, Hamilton County Sheriff, Clerk of the Hamilton County Criminal Court and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Dugger
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Norman F Wright
Defendant:
Judge Dugger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Hankins et al
as 3:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Pat Hankins and Judge Matthis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Deputy Brollen et al
as 2:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher
Defendant:
Deputy Brollen, Lieutenant Mowdy, Sheriff Wayne Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Danielle M White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timbs v. Public Defender's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Edward T Timbs
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office, General Sessions Court, Carter County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Lollis
Defendant:
Judge Harris and Natae Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Monolito B Cooper
Defendant:
Judge Montgomery and Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
