Cases 1 - 10 of 1,769
Haga v. Lawn Care and More Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gage Haga
Defendant:
Lawn Care and More Inc. and John C. Bushong
Means et al v. Revaira, LLC, et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jaime Means and Rainy Radwanski
Defendant:
Revaira, LLC doing business as Revaira Italian Steakhouse and George Hanna
Zappavigna v. Revaira, LLC, d/b/a Revaira Italian Steakhouse et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Zappavigna
Defendant:
Revaira, LLC, d/b/a Revaira Italian Steakhouse and George Hanna
Carroll v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WILLIAMS CARROLL
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and TSG RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Qin v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dujie Qin
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stephens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Stephens
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manning v. University Health System, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
University Health System, Inc. and The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Greg Manning
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
