Cases 161 - 170 of 27,708
Gambrell v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Roma Gambrell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Decker v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Roger J Decker
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. McFarlin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Patrick McFarlin, Sheriff Hodges and Q.C.H.C. Medical Company/Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Schley v. Barbee et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Natalie Schley
Defendant:
Gary M. Barbee, Shirley A. Barbee, B&B Rentals of NW FL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cunningham v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Jamie Cunningham and James Cunningham
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. rh Physicians of Big South Fork, PLLC et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
rh Physicians of Big South Fork, PLLC
Defendant:
Scott County Community Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Big South Fork Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Swann v. Barrong et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
James Barrong and Chief Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. LNU et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle LNU and Monica Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arp v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Arp, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart #698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
