Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Massey v. Bedford County, Tennessee
as 4:2012mc00001
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Massey
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee
Massey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Joyce Massey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Massey v. USA
as 1:2011cv00145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Allen Glen Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
West et al v. Berkline, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richard West , Tammy Dalton , Donna Campbell and others
Defendant:
Berkline, LLC , Berkline Benchcraft Holdings, LLC and Sun Capital Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Apple View River Resorts III, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Apple View River Resorts III, LLC, Christopher J Gettelfinger, Herman E Gettelfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moussaoui et al v. Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009 et al
as 3:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009, Frank Ricci, John Destefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Massey & Associates, P.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ronda Watkins
Defendant:
Massey & Associates, P.C. and Gary Massey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Deal et al v. Massey & Associates et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Beverly Deal and Jonathan Deal
Defendant:
Massey & Associates, Bill Speek and Gary Massey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Vickie Massey
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
