Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Overbay v. Carlton
as 2:2009cv00126
Petitioner: Thomas W Overbay
Respondent: Howard Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Russell et al
as 2:2009cv00118
Plaintiff: Richard L Norton
Defendant: Russell, Rurburn, Jerry Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overbay v. Carlton
as 2:2009mc00011
Petitioner: Thomas W Overbay
Respondent: Howard Carlton
Walker v. Actavis Group hf et al.
as 4:2009cv00057
Plaintiff: Carlton Edward Walker and Carlton Edward Walker
Defendant: Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Totowa, LLC, Activis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Horton v. Carlton et al
as 2:2009cv00102
Petitioner: Michael Horton
Respondent: Howard Carlton and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Carlton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00098
Petitioner: James L Parker
Respondent: Howard Carlton, State of Tennessee and Northeast Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Powell et al
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff: Ricky F Brown
Defendant: - Powell, - Julian, - Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Carlton et al
as 2:2009cv00040
Plaintiff: Avery B Jones
Defendant: Howard Carlton, George Little, - Norris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Carlton
as 2:2009cv00019
Petitioner: Ronald L Davis
Respondent: Howard Carlton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norton v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00002
Plaintiff: Richard L Norton
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, Howard Carlton, J Shephread and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?